Legal Opinion
Peste v. Mason County
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided June 14, 2006No. 33437-2-IIPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*462¶ 1 Lillian M. Peste, Sharon Johnston, and Bank of America, as trustees of the Fred G. Peste Trust; and Lillian M. Peste, individually (collectively Peste), appeal Mason County’s (County) denial of a rezone request. Peste asserts that (1) the County’s comprehensive plan and development regulations are void because the County adopted them without complying with statutory notice and public participation procedures, (2) the County’s comprehensive plan and development regulations violate Peste’s substantive due process rights, (3) the County’s comprehensive plan and development regulations…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- MacDonald, Sommer & Frates v. Yolo CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Havens v. C & D PLASTICS, INC.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
- Wenatchee Sportsmen Ass'n v. Chelan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Robinson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Sintra, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1992
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Peste v. Mason CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- Friends of Cedar Park Neighborhood v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- Thun v. City of Bonney LakeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- State Of Washington v. Karen A. ConwayCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- Tapps Brewing Inc. v. City of SumnerDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.