Legal Opinion

Thun v. City of Bonney Lake

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 8, 2011No. 40717-5-IIPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Worswick, A.C.J.

¶1 The ripeness doctrine ensures that regulatory takings claims are not litigated before they are fully developed at the local level. Because land use decisions involve a great deal of government discretion, courts must be careful not to weigh in on a dispute until the government has had an opportunity to render a final decision regarding the use of the land in question. Although we recognize that cases may be ripe when further administrative proceedings would be futile, we hold that takings plaintiffs Karl and Virginia Thun, Thomas Pavolka, Virginia Leslie Revocable Trust,…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cost Management Services, Inc. v. City of LakewoodCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  2. Powers v. W.B. Mobile Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  3. Karl J. Thun, Et Ux v. City Of Bonney LakeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  4. Bsre Point Wells, Lp v. Snohomish CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
  5. City Of Edmonds, V. The Edmonds Ebb Tide Assoc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2023

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API