Tapps Brewing Inc. v. City of Sumner
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT
LEIGHTON, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment on Federal Takings Issues (Dkt.42-1) and Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment on All Remaining Issues (Dkt.45-1). The Court has considered the pleadings filed in support of and in opposition to the motions and the file herein.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
The history of this ease spans more than nine years. This dispute concerns a stormwater pipe upgrade requirement imposed by Defendant City of Sumner (“City”) upon Plaintiffs Daniel and Andrea McClung…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- McClung v. City of SumnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Tapps Brewing Inc v. City of SumnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Tapps Brewing Inc v. City of SumnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008