Legal Opinion

Lorain-Amherst Transit, Inc. v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1947No. 30840PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

On this appeal a reversal of an order of the Public Utilities Commission is sought. Appellant, Lorain-Amherst Transit, Inc., a common carrier of persons by motor busses, filed its application with the Public Utilities Commission to amend its certificate of public convenience and necessity No. 6846, to transport persons upon and over the following extension of route, viz.:

Prom Lorain on Oberlin avenue, as extended to Ridge road, thence westerly to route No. 58, thence southerly to Oberlin and Wellington and return over the same route; also from Amherst over Elyria avenue to route…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Canton-East Liverpool Coach Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Lykins v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Scioto Valley Ry. & Power Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  4. A. & T. Motor Freight, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Continental Freight Forwarding Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of Kenton v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Co-Operative Legislative Committee of the Transportation Brotherhoods v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Thomas v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Boyle-Midway v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Edwards Motor Transit Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API