Thomas v. Public Utilities Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
“Review of orders of the Public Utilities Commission on appeal is limited to a consideration of whether the order is unreasonable or unlawful, and, on questions of fact, this court will not substitute its judgment for that of the commission unless it appears from the record that the finding and order were manifestly against the weight of the evidence.” Cremean v. Pub. Util. Comm. (1976), 48 Ohio St. 2d 163 [2 O.O.3d 342], paragraph one of the syllabus; see, also, Cleveland Elec. Illum. Co. v. Pub. Util. Comm. (1975), 42 Ohio St. 2d 403 [71 O.O.2d 393], paragraphs four and eight of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- City of Akron v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1966
- East Ohio Gas Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1938
- Grossman v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1966
- Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Myers v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- In re Complaint of Cameron Creek Apts. v. Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2013
- In re Complaint of Cameron Creek Apts. v. Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2013
- Myers v. Pub. Util. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992