Boyle-Midway v. Public Utilities Commission

We are urged by appellant to hold that the commission’s decision is unreasonable and unlawful in that the tariff committee failed to sustain its burden *13of proof under R. C. 4909.271 to establish the tariff alteration as reasonable and just, appellant maintaining that the reasonableness and lawfulness of the tariff could not be supported by the type of evidence adduced.

In brief and in oral argument, appellant suggests that the quantum of evidence necessary to establish the reasonableness of the commission’s decision increasing a rate is something greater than a preponderance of the evidence.…