Continental Freight Forwarding Co. v. Public Utilities Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtStephenson, J.
Applicant contends that a certificate should have been issued to it for several reasons, to wit:(a) There is no certificate covering Ohio-United States Route No. 42;(b) Ohio-United States Route No. 42 is the shortest route between Cincinnati and Cleveland;(c) That applicant offers a through route from one terminus to the other;(d) That it will leave its Cincinnati terminus later and deliver its freight in Cleveland earlier;(e) That it will make no pick-ups between termini, but handle through freight exclusively;(f) That there is public demand for such service;(g) That such service is…
2Cited by9 opinions
- H. & K. Motor Transportation, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1939
- Miller Transporters v. Public Serv. Com'nSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1988
- Pierce Auto Freight Lines, Inc. v. FlaggOregon Supreme Court · 1944
- City of Kenton v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1965
- Lorain-Amherst Transit, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1947
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.