Legal Opinion

Continental Freight Forwarding Co. v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1932No. 23613PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephenson, J.

Applicant contends that a certificate should have been issued to it for several reasons, to wit:(a) There is no certificate covering Ohio-United States Route No. 42;(b) Ohio-United States Route No. 42 is the shortest route between Cincinnati and Cleveland;(c) That applicant offers a through route from one terminus to the other;(d) That it will leave its Cincinnati terminus later and deliver its freight in Cleveland earlier;(e) That it will make no pick-ups between termini, but handle through freight exclusively;(f) That there is public demand for such service;(g) That such service is…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. H. & K. Motor Transportation, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Miller Transporters v. Public Serv. Com'nSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1988
  3. Pierce Auto Freight Lines, Inc. v. FlaggOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  4. City of Kenton v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Lorain-Amherst Transit, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1947

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API