Legal Opinion

Burnham v. Edwards

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 28, 1927No. 16946PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, C.

This is an action to recover against the surety on a supersedeas bond. The bond was a part of the evolution of a certain lawsuit against the defendant in error, Tony Edwards, commenced by AVilliam Brooks and W. C. Brooks, in which action they sought a money judgment against Edwards, th'e defendant, and a decree foreclosing a mortgage on certain lands formerly sold to Edwards by William Brooks, a mortgage thereon having been executed by Edwards back to Brooks to secure the payment of the purchase price thereof. Edwards filed a cross-petition against plaintiff therein asking for a…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Aeschlimann v. . Presbyterian HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. Manning v. . GouldNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  3. Richardson v. PennySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900
  4. Wallace v. HollySupreme Court of Georgia · 1853
  5. First National Bank v. RogersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1868

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. TorianSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  2. Locke v. GilbertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. Venator v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  4. Williams v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  5. Kinsey v. TownsendSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API