Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. Rogers

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 15, 1868PublishedCited by 20 opinions

The plaintiff in this case appeals from the order of the District Court of Dakota county, denying a motion to strike out the answers of defendants as sham and irrelevant. The case is fully stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

-McMillan, J.

By the Oourt This is an action brought upon a bond given by the defendants upon an appeal to the Supreme Court by the defendant Rogers, from a judgment iñ a.former action by the plaintiff against Mm. The complaint sets up the recovery of a judgment against the defendant Rogers, .on the 5th of February, 1867, for $5380.50; that an execution was issued upon the judgment on the 24th day of April, 1867; that on the 13th day of June, 1867, the defendant Rogers gave notice of appeal from said judgment, and that the defendants in this action on. that day, in the manner provided by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Green v. BurkeNew York Supreme Court · 1840
  2. Cook v. DickersonThe Superior Court of New York City · 1853
  3. Rohrer v. TurrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1860
  4. North Western Express Co. v. LandesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1861
  5. De Zeng v. FyfeThe Superior Court of New York City · 1857

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Lindley v. KelleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Central Union Telephone Co. v. State ex rel. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Sherin v. BrackettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  4. Morrissey v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Fawcett v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1896

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API