Legal Opinion

Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Torian

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 17, 1930No. 8 Div. 176PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAYRE, J,

Suit on a bond of supersedeas conditioned to pay, among other things, “all such costs and damages as any party aggrieved may sustain by reason of the wrongful appeal” in the case of Ward v. Torian, 216 Ala. 288, 112 So. 815. The bond was payable to the clerk of the trial court, and this suit is by the clerk for the use and benefit of plaintiff, appellee. Plaintiff sought to recover damages in the way of counsel fees, liability for which had been incurred in the defense of the appeal and in defending against an application for rehearing in this court.

Ward v. Torian was an action of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Dothard v. SheidSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  2. Tecumseh Iron Co. v. CampSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  3. Burnham v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  4. Miller v. VaughanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  5. Ward v. TorianSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Alfab, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  2. Commonwealth Life Ins. Co. v. HarmonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  3. Osborn v. RileySupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  4. Jones v. Regions BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  5. Life Ins. Co. of Georgia v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API