Legal Opinion
Kaahumanu v. County of Maui
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 14, 2003No. 02-15189PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FISHER, Circuit Judge.
■ This case arises from the Maui County Council’s denial of a conditional use permit that would have allowed plaintiffs-appel-lees (“plaintiffs”) to conduct a commercial wedding business on beach-front residential property. Plaintiffs brought suit under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 (RLUIPA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc, against Maui County and members of the Maui County Council in their individual and official capacities after the Council voted not to grant the permit. ■The defendants-appellants (“defendants’’1) moved to…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Forrester v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ChadhaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Tenney v. BrandhoveSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Lake Country Estates, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Bogan v. Scott-HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Kwai Fun Wong v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Kaahumanu v. County Of MauiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Guru Nanak Sikh Society of Yuba City v. County of SutterDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2003
- THUNDERBIRD HOTELS, LLC v. City of PortlandDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2009
- Seum v. OsborneDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2018
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.