Legal Opinion

Goodman v. Holmes & McLaurin Attorneys at Law

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 2, 2008No. COA07-199PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEELMAN, Judge.

Where plaintiff’s professional negligence claim was barred by the statute of repose, the trial court did not err in dismissing this claim pursuant to N.C. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). Fraudulent conduct is not in the ordinary course of business of a law partnership, and the trial court did not err in dismissing plaintiff’s claim of fraud as to McLaurin’s partners.

I. Factual and Procedural Background

Since these matters were decided by the trial court on defendants’ motions to dismiss pursuant to Rules 12(b)(6) and 12(c) of the Rules of Civil Procedure, both the trial court and this…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Zimmerman v. Hogg & Allen, Professional Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. Black v. LittlejohnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Diaz v. Division of Social ServicesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
  5. Combs & Associates, Inc. v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Town of Beech Mountain v. Genesis Wildlife Sanctuary, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  2. Tong v. DunnCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  3. KB Aircraft Acquisition, LLC v. BerryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  4. SUGAR CREEK CHARTER SCHOOL, INC. v. StateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  5. Carle v. Wyrick, Robbins, Yates & Ponton, LLPCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API