Legal Opinion
Helstoski v. Goldstein
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided March 28, 1977No. 76-1956PublishedCited by 82 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Henry Helstoski, former Congressman from Northern New Jersey, has appealed from an order of the district court, dismiss*565ing his action for money damages and equitable relief1 against United States Attorney Jonathan Goldstein, members of Mr. Goldstein’s staff, and the office of the United States Attorney. Since we have concluded that the district court erred in dismissing the complaint before any evidence was adduced, we reverse and remand.
I
Mr. Helstoski, who is presently under indictment for alleged violations of certain federal statutes, commenced his litigation on October…
3Cases cited10 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Graziani v. Committee on Legal EthicsSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by82 opinions
- Rose v. BartleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Kulwicki v. DawsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Schrob v. CattersonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Colburn v. Upper Darby TownshipCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Rogin v. Bensalem TownshipCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.