Crane v. Ross
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Washtenaw; Kinne, J. Assumpsit by George C. Crane against George A. Ross and Mildred E. Ross for broker’s commissions. A judgment for plaintiff against defendant George A. Ross for less than the amount claimed, and for defendant Mildred E. Ross on a directed verdict, is reviewed by plaintiff on writ of error.
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
This is an action of assumpsit to recover certain commissions claimed to be due the plaintiff from the defendants in effecting an agreement for an exchange of real estate. The defendants are husband and wife. The lands which the plaintiff claims he was to dispose of for the defendants belonged to Mildred E. Ross, and were located in St. Clair county. The parties to this suit all resided in Ann Arbor, where the defendant George A. Ross was a student in the University of Michigan.
It is the claim of the plaintiff that the lands to be disposed of for the defendants were of the value of $11,000,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Chandler v. AllisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
- Fox v. Barrett's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- People v. SartoriMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Althouse v. McMillanMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
- Walbridge v. BarrettMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Spencer v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Olshove v. Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
- B. Marx & Son v. KingMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
- Elliott v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
- Sexton v. NiewoonderMichigan Supreme Court · 1941