Elliott v. Detroit United Railway

I do not concur in the opinion of Mr. Justice Steere that this case should be reversed because of improper argument of counsel. Many of the objections to the argument cannot be considered because no rulings were requested or obtained. Crane v. Ross, 168 Mich. 623; Good Roads Construction Co. v. Railway Co., 173 Mich. 1; B. Marx & Son v. King, 177 Mich. 662. The remaining objections, when analyzed, fall far short of being reversible error.

Omitting that part of the argument to which objection was taken, but no rulings were made, we have remaining three objections which may properly be…