Legal Opinion

B. Marx & Son v. King

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1913No. Docket No. 13PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Washtenaw; Kinne, J. Assumpsit by Jacob L. Marx and Eugene H. Kopple, copartners, as B. Marx & Son, against Johanna King, executrix of the estate of Joseph King, deceased, for goods sold to decedent. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.

This is a controversy between plaintiffs, who were wholesalers of leather good and furnishings in the city of Detroit, and one of their customers who carried on business in Ypsilanti. They dealt with each other for several years without serious disagreement, until the present controversy arose over the allowance of certain discounts which defendant King claimed he was entitled to under an agreement with their agent Berger, and which was subsequently ratified by Mr. Marx, one of the plaintiffs. In July, 1906, the defendant expanded his business by jobbing some goods in connection with his…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Marx v. KingMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Crane v. RossMichigan Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Spencer v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Silverstone v. London Assurance Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Elliott v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API