Legal Opinion

Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. Klaus

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 18, 1944No. 31344PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOsborn, J.

This action was brought

by Frank Klaus in the district court of Seminole county against Stanolind Oil & Gas Company for damages for the loss of a mule which became seriously injured on the premises under lease and control of the company. The cause was tried to a jury and verdict rendered for plaintiff, from which judgment thereon the defendant has appealed. The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.

There seems to be no material dispute as to the facts. It is shown by the evidence that the plaintiff was the owner of two mules recently purchased. On the day of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pure Oil Co. v. GearSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  2. Midland Valley Railroad Co. v. GraneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  4. Gypsy Oil Co. v. GinnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. WainscottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McMahan v. McCaffertySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  2. Sanders v. McMichaelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  3. OKLAHOMA RAILWAY CO. v. StrongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  4. Beatrice Foods Co. v. JenningsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  5. Kansas, Oklahoma & Gulf Ry. Co. v. McAnallySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API