Legal Opinion
Gypsy Oil Co. v. Ginn
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 11, 1923No. 13350PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtOoohran, J.
The defendant in error instituted this action against the plaintiff in error in the district court of Garter county, to recover damages on account of the death of Clarence Edgar Ginn, husband of Mrs. Tessie Ginn and father of the other plaintiffs. The case was tried to a jury, and the jury returned a verdict against the plaintiff in error in the sum of $25,000, and the plaintiff in error has prosecuted this appeal. Dor convenience, the plaintiff in error will hereinafter be designated as defendant, and defendant in error designated as plaintiff.
The plaintiffs allege that Clarence Edgar Ginn…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Virtue v. Creamery Package Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- First Nat. Bank of Mounds v. CoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. BartonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Weleetka Cotton Oil Co. v. BrookshireSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Midland Valley Railroad Co. v. GraneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Gypsy Oil Co. v. GinnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Hamilton v. Swigart Coal MineWyoming Supreme Court · 1943
- E. S. Billington Lumber Co. v. CheathamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Salt River Valley Water Users' Ass'n v. Compton Ex Rel. ComptonArizona Supreme Court · 1932
- Newman v. RoachSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.