Legal Opinion

National Surety Co. v. Pixton

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1922No. 3783PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrick, J.

The plaintiff, in its complaint, after alleging all of the necessary matters of capacity and inducement, in substance alleges that in March, 1917, the State Treasurer of the state of Utah was about to deposit in the Moab State Bank, of Moab, Utah, large sums of the state’s funds; that before mak*290ing tbe deposit of said state funds tbe State Treasurer was by law required to take, and tbat be did take and receive, a bond in tbe sum of $20,000 as security from said bank for tbe repayment of said funds; tbat upon application of said bank the plaintiff, on March 6, 1917, duly made and delivered, as…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Matter of Carnegie Trust CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. Booth & Flinn, Ltd. v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  3. Booth v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  4. Aetna Accident & Liability Co. v. MillerMontana Supreme Court · 1918
  5. State v. FosterWyoming Supreme Court · 1895

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Nelson v. West Englewood Trust & Savings BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1933
  2. State ex rel. Rankin v. Madison State BankMontana Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Montgomery v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  4. National Surety Co. v. MorrisWyoming Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Ghingher v. PearsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API