Legal Opinion

In Re TMJ Implants Products Liability Litigation

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided January 17, 1995No. 4:94-cv-01001PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAGNUSON, Chief Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

These matters, which are consolidated for pretrial purposes under 28 U.S.C. § 1407, are before the Court upon early Motions for Summary Judgment by Defendants 1 E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Company (DuPont) and American Durafilm Company, Inc. (American Durafilm), and upon a Motion to Dismiss, Sever and Remand by Duke University and Dr. Edward A. Dolan (Duke Defendants). For the following reasons, the Court grants DuPont and American Durafilm’s Motions for Summary Judgment and grants the Duke Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, Sever and Remand as detailed below.

II.…

2Cases cited75 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  5. Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Humble Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. GomezTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. In Re Temporomandibular Joint (Tmj) Implants Products Liability LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  3. Evelyn Nye v. Bayer Cropscience, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Gray v. Badger Mining Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  5. Bean v. Baxter Healthcare Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API