Legal Opinion

Humble Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. Gomez

Texas Supreme Court

Decided September 17, 2004No. 01-0652PublishedCited by 126 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hecht

in which Justice OWEN, Justice JEFFERSON, Justice SMITH, Justice WAINWRIGHT, and Justice BRISTER joined.

Generally, a product supplier must warn expected users of foreseeable risks that make the product unreasonably dangerous,1 but a supplier need not warn of risks that are common knowledge,2 and when the product is supplied through an intermediary, a supplier may sometimes rely on the intermediary to warn the actual product users.3 We must apply these basic principles to the circumstances presented in this case. Specifically, the issue is whether a supplier of flint used for abrasive blasting…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. American Tobacco Co., Inc. v. GrinnellTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Centeq Realty, Inc. v. SieglerTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Beale v. HardyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
  5. Greater Houston Transportation Co. v. PhillipsTexas Supreme Court · 1991

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by126 opinions

  1. Timpte Industries, Inc. v. GishTexas Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Randy Austin v. Kroger Texas, L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Chon Tri v. J.T.T.Texas Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Nabors Drilling, U.S.A., Inc. v. EscotoTexas Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Samlowski v. WootenTexas Supreme Court · 2011

121 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API