Johnson v. Maryland Casualty Co.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MINTON, Circuit Judge.
John Wirth was a salesman for Swift and Company. His territory was confined to the city of Superior, Wisconsin. He was furnished an automobile by his employer to call on the trade. When he took the automobile out, it was to be used only for the purpose of performing his duties as a salesman for his employer. The employer had on March 21, 1939 a rule, which applied to Wirth, that his day’s work was done at five p. m., at which time the automobile was' to be put in the garage at Duluth. Drinking was prohibited during working hours and passengers were not to be transported…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Stovall v. New York Indemnity Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1928
- Dickinson v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
- Laroche v. Farm Bureau Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Peterson v. MaloneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Drewek v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hooper v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Hawkeye Casualty Co. v. RoseCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
- EUREKA-SECURITY FIRE & MARINE INSU. CO. v. SimonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
- Hartford Insurance Group v. WinklerNevada Supreme Court · 1973
- Aparicio Bosch v. Asociación de Maestros de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1952
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.