Legal Opinion
Hawkeye Casualty Co. v. Rose
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided April 21, 1950No. 14054_1PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARDNER, Chief Judge.
The question for decision in this case is whether the appellee David Rose is entitled to protection under a liability insurance policy issued by appellant, Hawkeye Casualty Company. The parties will be referred to as they were designated in the trial court. The essential facts are not in dispute and so far as here material they may be stated as follows:
Defendant David Rose purchased a new Dodge automobile in 1940 and had the title thereto taken in the name of his wife Bell Rose. This automobile was stolen from a parking lot in Kansas City, Missouri, about March 13, 1947.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Thomson v. ThomsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1946
- Card v. Commercial Cas. Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1936
- Floyd v. Ring Const. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1948
- American Casualty Co. of Reading, Pa. v. WindhamCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
- Samuels v. American Automobile Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1945
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Varble Ex Rel. Varble v. StanleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
- Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance Company, a Minnesota Corporation v. Maxwell M. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
- MFA Mutual Insurance Company v. MullinDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1957
- Adams v. Kansas City Life InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2000
- Imperial Casualty & Indemnity Co. v. Morris and Gertrude Relder, and the Home Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.