State Board of Examiners for Architects & Engineers v. Rodgers
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Swiggart
Proceeding under the authority and direction of Code, sections 9316, 9317, the complainants sue to enjoin the defendant “from practicing architecture,” without complying with the statute, Code, sections 7098-7112, requiring examination and registration of architects.
The chancellor found against the defendant’s contention that his plan and method of business did not amount to the practice of architecture, and enjoined him, in general terms, from “practicing architecture” in this State until he shall have been duly registered and certified. The defendant’s appeal to the Court of Appeals was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Motlow v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1911
- Campbell v. McIntyxeTennessee Supreme Court · 1932
- State Board of Examiners for Architects & Engineers v. Standard Engineering Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1928
3Cited by9 opinions
- State ex rel. Loser v. National Optical Stores Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1949
- First Suburban Water Utility Dist. v. McCanlessTennessee Supreme Court · 1941
- Clark v. EadsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
- Cantrell v. PerkinsTennessee Supreme Court · 1941
- State v. BeadleArizona Supreme Court · 1958
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.