Legal Opinion

First Suburban Water Utility Dist. v. McCanless

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1941PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chambliss

By this suit it is sought (1) to recover certain State taxes paid under protest to the defendant Commissioner, and (2) to enjoin the County Trustee from collecting taxes assessed by the Railroad and Public Utilities Commission. The Suburban Company is a ‘ ‘ Utility District, ’ ’ organized under Chapter 248, Public Acts of 1937, which provides for the creation of Public Corporations to be styled “Districts,” with power of perpetual succession, “for the purpose of conducting’ and operating a water, sewer, or fire protection system or two or more of such systems and to carry out such purpose it…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Tennessee Electric Power Co. v. City of ChattanoogaTennessee Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Grainger County v. State ex rel. MynattTennessee Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Myar v. MitchellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1904

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Natural Gas Utility DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Highwoods Properties, Inc. v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. EdwardsTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Witt v. McCanlessTennessee Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Madison Suburban Utility Dist. v. CarsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1950

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API