Legal Opinion

Campbell v. McIntyxe

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 1932PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Swiggaet

Complainant, describing himself as having been a trained accountant since 1919, filed his bill in this cause against the members of the State Board of Accountancy, created by Public Acts 1925, chapter 33, carried into the Code of 1932 at sections 70,83-7097, asserting that the enforcement of said statute operates to deprive him ■ of rights guaranteed by article 1, section 8, and article 11, section 8, of the Constitution of Tennessee. By demurrer to' the bill, the defendants pleaded the constitutionality of the statute. The Chancellor sustained the demurrer and dismissed the hill, from which…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Louis K. Liggett Co. v. BaldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  4. Jay Burns Baking Co. v. BryanSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Motlow v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Loser v. National Optical Stores Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Moore v. GrillisMississippi Supreme Court · 1949
  3. State v. GreesonTennessee Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Florida Accountants Association v. DandelakeSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  5. Livesay v. Tennessee Board of Examiners in WatchmakingTennessee Supreme Court · 1959

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API