Legal Opinion
Doyle v. Department of Human Services
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided April 28, 2003PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.
[¶ 1] Cathy Doyle appeals from the grant of a summary judgment entered in the Superior Court (Kennebec County, Marden, J.) in favor of the Department of Human Services (DHS). Doyle contends that the court erred when it concluded that Doyle failed to establish her claims for discrimination, retaliation, and a hostile work environment under the Maine Human Rights Act (MHRA), 5 M.R.S.A. §§ 4551-4634 (2002). We find no error and affirm the judgment.
I. CASE HISTORY
[¶ 2] The following undisputed, properly supported and cited material and background facts are stated in the light most favorable to…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Gillen v. Fallon Ambulance Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Theriault v. Genesis Healthcare LLCCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
- Stanley v. Hancock County CommissionersSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004
- Cookson v. Brewer School DepartmentSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
- Daniels v. Narraguagus Bay Health Care FacilitySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
- Claire Trott v. H.D. Goodall HospitalSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2013
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.