Legal Opinion

BROWN DEVELOPMENT CORP. v. Hemond

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided September 23, 2008No. Docket: Cum-08-09PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Majority: SILVER, MEAD, and GORMAN, JJ.

Dissent: ALEXANDER, J.

MEAD, J.

[¶ 1] Maureen Hemond appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Cole, J.) granting summary judgment in favor of the Brown Development Corporation on its complaint for specific performance of a contract for the sale of real estate. Hemond argues that the Superior Court erred in applying the statute of frauds to bar consideration of an alleged oral condition precedent. We vacate the judgment.

I. BACKGROUND

[¶ 2] Maureen Hemond owns property in Scarborough.1 They sought to develop a portion of this property…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Dehahn v. InnesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
  2. Handy Boat Service, Inc. v. Professional Services, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
  3. Reliance National Indemnity v. Knowles Industrial Services, Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
  4. Rogers v. JacksonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
  5. Astor v. Boulos Co., Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Cookson v. Brewer School DepartmentSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
  2. John McClare v. James J. RochaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
  3. State of Maine v. Roxanne JeskeySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
  4. Dunn v. WomackCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2011
  5. MMG Insurance Co. v. Podiatry Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2017

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API