Legal Opinion
National Parks & Conservation Ass'n v. County of Riverside
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 16, 1996No. D022183PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HUFFMAN, J.
In 1992, the board of supervisors for the respondent County of Riverside (the County) approved a landfill project proposed by real parties in interest Kaiser Steel Resources, Inc., Kaiser Eagle Mountain, Inc., and Mine Reclamation Corporation (MRC) (sometimes collectively Kaiser/MRC), and also approved the environmental impact report (EIR) prepared to analyze that project, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). (Pub. Resources Code, 1 § 21000 et seq.) Appellants herein, National Parks and Conservation Association et al. (the Association) brought a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Western States Petroleum Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- In Re William M.California Supreme Court · 1970
- Stasher v. Harger-HaldemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- County of Suffolk v. Secretary of InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Communities for a Better Environment v. City of RichmondCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- County Sanitation District No. 2 v. County of KernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Save Round Valley Alliance v. County of InyoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Riverwatch v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Hermosa Beach Stop Oil Coalition v. City of Hermosa BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.