Legal Opinion
Mid-Continent Life Ins. Co. v. Tackett
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 18, 1930No. 19401PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REID, C.
The plaintiff brought this suit against the defendant to recover as the beneficiary of an insurance policy issued on the life of her father,, James Wright Tackett, by the defendant, dated January 2-2, 1923, for the sum of $1,500. On the trial there was a judgment for the plaintiff, ánd defendant appealed.
The defendant first assigns as error the fact that the court overruled its demurrer to plaintiff’s petition.
The petition, in an amplified form, alleged the issuance of the policy for $1,500 by the defendant on the life of James Wright Tack-ett; that plaintiff was his daughter and the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. LovejoySupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Underwood v. Security Life and Annuity Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1917
- Farmers' Nat. Bank of Tecumseh v. McCallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Manhattan Life Ins. Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- Levan v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Misskelley v. Home Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- McAndrews v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNebraska Supreme Court · 1937
- Atlas Life Ins. Co. v. HoltSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Edwards v. Central Life Assur. SocietySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Grand Lodge A. O. U. W. v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.