Legal Opinion

Reed v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 27, 1984No. 83-1098, 83-1099PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROGERS, Associate Judge:

Appellants were convicted by a jury of unlawful distribution of a controlled substance (heroin), D.C.Code § 33-541(a)(l) (Supp.1984), and unlawful possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance (heroin) Id. They appeal on the grounds the trial judge erred in denying their motions for mistrial when the prosecutor improperly impeached Reed with prior convictions, and improperly commented in rebuttal closing argument on Washington’s failure to testify. Upon a review of the record we find no reversible error and affirm. Pursuant to our supervisory…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Watts v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. People v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Boyd v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Dorman v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Wilson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Haley v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Freeman v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API