Freeman v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
TERRY, Associate Judge:
Appellant was charged with attempted second-degree burglary 1 and destruction of property. 2 A jury found him guilty of the former offense but acquitted him of the latter. On appeal he argues that the evidence was insufficient to sustain his conviction and that the prosecutor, while cross-examining him, committed misconduct by summarizing the testimony of government witnesses and then asking appellant if he knew of any reason why they would lie. The sufficiency argument is entirely without merit. We agree with appellant that the prosecutor’s questioning was improper,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- United States v. DotterweichSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Watts v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
- Commonwealth v. KennedyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. Casteneda-PerezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
- West v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Scott v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Jenner v. LeapleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. MoralesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.