Legal Opinion
Haley v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided June 13, 2002No. 97-CF-238, 99-CO-352PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Per curiam
On November 4, 1996, a jury found appellant Howard E. Haley guilty of aggravated assault while armed against his girlfriend Paulette Scott. See D.C.Code §§ 22-504.1,-3202 (1996). Haley noted his direct appeal on February 4, 1997. On March 31, 1998, Haley filed a “Motion Pursuant to D.C.Code § 23-110 for Relief from Sentence and Motion for a New Trial Pursuant to [Superior Court] Criminal Rule 33 with Hearing Request.” 1 See D.C.Code § 23-110 (1996); Super. Ct. Crim. R. 33. Without an evidentiary hear ing, the trial judge denied both the § 23-110 and the Rule 33 motions. Haley’s appeal from…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Thompson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- People v. NaylorIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
- COMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE AND RAND SIMBERG v. MICHAEL E. MANN, NATIONAL REVIEW, INC. v. MICHAEL E. MANNDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- Bouknight v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- EMERO S. TORNERO v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- Gary C. Dickens & Antwarn D. Fenner v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.