Hawks v. City of Westmoreland
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DROWOTA, Justice.
The primary issue in this appeal is whether the City of Westmoreland had “constructive notice” of the dangerous and defective condition of the fire hydrants which resulted in the total fire loss of the home of the plaintiffs, Tracey and Dale Hawks. Finding that the inoperable fire hydrants would have been discovered had the City performed an adequate inspection, the lower courts charged the City with constructive notice of the dangerous and defective condition and held it liable to the plaintiffs for the damages that could have been avoided had the fire hydrants been…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Owens v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
- Carson Creek Vacation Resorts, Inc. v. State, Department of RevenueTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
- Ezell v. CockrellTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
- Kirby v. MacOn CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1994
- Lucius v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by164 opinions
- Fields v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. PettusTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
- John Paul Seals v. State of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
- Eastman Chemical Co. v. JohnsonTennessee Supreme Court · 2004
- Realty Shop, Inc. v. RR Westminster Holding, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
159 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.