Houghton v. Aramark Educational Resources, Inc.
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WILLIAM M. BARKER, J„
delivered the opinion of the court, the panel of which
consisted of FRANK F. DROWOTA, III, C.J., E. RILEY ANDERSON, ADOLPHO A. BIRCH, JR., and JANICE M. HOLDER, JJ.
Pursuant to Tennessee Supreme Court Rule 23, we accepted certification of a question of law from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee concerning regulations issued by the Tennessee Department of Human Services. The certified question from the district court asks us to determine whether the rationale of statutorily imposed vicarious liability under Gleaves v. Checker Cab…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Owens v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
- Gleaves v. Checker Cab Transit Corp., Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2000
- Lavin v. JordonTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. JohnsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
- Jordan v. Baptist Three Rivers HospitalTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by222 opinions
- Faulkner v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
- Colonial Pipeline Co. v. MorganTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
- Michael Lind v. Beaman Dodge, Inc., d/b/a Beaman Dodge Chrysler JeepTennessee Supreme Court · 2011
- Steven Waters v. Reagan Farr, Commissioner of Revenue for the State of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
- Osborn v. MarrTennessee Supreme Court · 2004
217 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.