Legal Opinion

Houghton v. Aramark Educational Resources, Inc.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 2002PublishedCited by 222 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WILLIAM M. BARKER, J„

delivered the opinion of the court, the panel of which

consisted of FRANK F. DROWOTA, III, C.J., E. RILEY ANDERSON, ADOLPHO A. BIRCH, JR., and JANICE M. HOLDER, JJ.

Pursuant to Tennessee Supreme Court Rule 23, we accepted certification of a question of law from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee concerning regulations issued by the Tennessee Department of Human Services. The certified question from the district court asks us to determine whether the rationale of statutorily imposed vicarious liability under Gleaves v. Checker Cab…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Owens v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Gleaves v. Checker Cab Transit Corp., Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Lavin v. JordonTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. JohnsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  5. Jordan v. Baptist Three Rivers HospitalTennessee Supreme Court · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by222 opinions

  1. Faulkner v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Colonial Pipeline Co. v. MorganTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Michael Lind v. Beaman Dodge, Inc., d/b/a Beaman Dodge Chrysler JeepTennessee Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Steven Waters v. Reagan Farr, Commissioner of Revenue for the State of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Osborn v. MarrTennessee Supreme Court · 2004

217 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API