People v. Jollet
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
SHAW, J. pro tem.
The indictment against defendants contains two charges of grand theft and three of burglary. After a jury waiver and trial by the court, they were acquitted-of the burglary charged in count V and found guilty of all the other charges, and they appeal from the judgments and from the orders denying each of them a new trial. The only contention made on appeal is that the evidence is insufficient to support the findings of guilt. Facts set forth in the following statement are shown by evidence adduced by the prosecution, unless otherwise stated.
Counts I and II relate to a theft…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. TarboxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- People v. Wong Ah YouCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- People v. VietsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- People v. SilvaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- People v. Ong GitCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. AlexanderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- People v. GrantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- People v. WhitehurstCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- People v. GrahamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- People v. TimsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.