Legal Opinion

People v. Silva

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 28, 1920No. Crim. No. 526PublishedCited by 11 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

The defendant was by information charged with and by the jury convicted of the crime of grand larceny in the superior court of Sacramento County, and appeals from the judgment and the order denying bim a new trial.

The specific charge stated in the information is that the defendant stole the sum of $480 from one John Glavich, in the city of Sacramento, on the twenty-ninth day of December, 1919.

[1] The principal point upon which the defendant relies for a reversal is that the evidence does not support the verdict, and in the outset it is just as well to announce our conclusion to be, after a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. TarboxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. People v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. People v. NelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. State v. SuitorMontana Supreme Court · 1911
  5. United States v. HartDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1897

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. GeibelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  2. People v. PlanaganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  3. People v. VietsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  4. State v. ArnoldMontana Supreme Court · 1929
  5. People v. JolletCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API