Legal Opinion

People v. Whitehurst

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 30, 1952No. Crim. 4766PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VALLÉE, J.

Defendant was charged in four counts with (1) a violation of section 288 of the Penal Code, lewd and lascivious act on the body of a child 10 years of age (Count I); (2) a violation of section 288(a), copulation of the sexual organ of the same child (Count II); (3) a violation of section 286, sodomy on the same child (Count III); a violation of section 207, kidnaping the child (Count IV). He was convicted by the court, sitting without a jury, of the offense charged in Count I, and acquitted of the offenses charged in Counts II, III and IV. He was found not to be a sexual psychopath.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. NewlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. People v. HustonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. People v. CodinaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  4. People v. AmickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. People v. KlinkenbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Industrial Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  2. People v. CahanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. People v. DragooCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. People v. AbnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. People v. WitzelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API