Legal Opinion

People v. Alexander

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 29, 1960No. Crim. 3734PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuniway, J.

Appeal from a judgment of conviction (granting probation) and order denying motion for new trial, upon a charge of arson (Pen. Code, §448a.) Appellant claims (1) that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the verdict; (2) that the court erred in refusing to instruct the jury upon the defense of unconsciousness (Pen. Code, § 26, subd. Five); and (3) that the court abused its discretion in fixing the terms of probation. We conclude that the judgment must be affirmed.

1. The evidence is sufficient.

We, of course, must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, in…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. People v. CarmenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. People v. GorshenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. People v. PutnamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. People v. BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  5. People v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. People v. BeagleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. People v. BirkettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. People v. ReyesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Bush v. BrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Franklin v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1964

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API