Legal Opinion

People v. Tims

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 2, 1959No. Crim. 3579PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WAGLER, J. pro tem. *

Defendant was convicted by a jury of a violation of Penal Code, section 464—burglary with explosives. This section so far as pertinent provides that “Any person who, with intent to commit crime, enters . . . any building . . . and opens or attempts to open any . . . safe ... by use of acetylene torch ... is guilty of burglary with explosives.”

Defendant contends: (1) that the trial court erred in the admission in evidence of certain extrajudicial statements made by him at the time of and subsequent to his arrest; (2) that the evidence was insufficient to sustain his…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. People v. BarryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. People v. SelbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  3. People v. BrittainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. People v. TarboxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. People v. OrcallesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. GarnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. People v. RomanoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  3. People v. BeemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. People v. HickokCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API