People v. Tims
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
WAGLER, J. pro tem. *
Defendant was convicted by a jury of a violation of Penal Code, section 464—burglary with explosives. This section so far as pertinent provides that “Any person who, with intent to commit crime, enters . . . any building . . . and opens or attempts to open any . . . safe ... by use of acetylene torch ... is guilty of burglary with explosives.”
Defendant contends: (1) that the trial court erred in the admission in evidence of certain extrajudicial statements made by him at the time of and subsequent to his arrest; (2) that the evidence was insufficient to sustain his…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- People v. BarryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- People v. SelbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- People v. BrittainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- People v. TarboxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- People v. OrcallesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. GarnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- People v. RomanoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- People v. BeemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- People v. HickokCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.