Legal Opinion

Auto Owners Insurance v. Langford

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided March 30, 1998No. 2822PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STILWELL, Judge:

This is an automobile insurance case. The trial court determined that Olympia S. Langford was not a resident relative entitled to recover underinsured benefits under her grandmother’s automobile insurance policy. Langford appeals. We affirm. 1

I

On July 9, 1995, Langford and her six-month-old son, Se-ma;], were riding in a vehicle that collided head-on with a pickup truck. Semaj was killed and Langford suffered severe injuries. The medical bills exceeded $200,000 and, after exhausting all other coverage, Langford remained indebted to the hospital.

Auto Owners Insurance Company’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Felts v. Richland CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  2. Charleston County School District v. State Budget & Control BoardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  3. Gambrell v. Travelers Ins. CompaniesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
  4. Hofer v. St. ClairSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  5. Cherry v. ThomassonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. BarrettCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
  2. Electro-Lab of Aiken, Inc. v. Sharp Construction Co. of Sumter, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  3. Lee v. University of South CarolinaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
  4. Cook v. State Farm Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  5. Fickling v. City of CharlestonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API