Auto Owners Insurance v. Langford
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
STILWELL, Judge:
This is an automobile insurance case. The trial court determined that Olympia S. Langford was not a resident relative entitled to recover underinsured benefits under her grandmother’s automobile insurance policy. Langford appeals. We affirm. 1
I
On July 9, 1995, Langford and her six-month-old son, Se-ma;], were riding in a vehicle that collided head-on with a pickup truck. Semaj was killed and Langford suffered severe injuries. The medical bills exceeded $200,000 and, after exhausting all other coverage, Langford remained indebted to the hospital.
Auto Owners Insurance Company’s…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Felts v. Richland CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
- Charleston County School District v. State Budget & Control BoardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
- Gambrell v. Travelers Ins. CompaniesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
- Hofer v. St. ClairSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
- Cherry v. ThomassonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. BarrettCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
- Electro-Lab of Aiken, Inc. v. Sharp Construction Co. of Sumter, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
- Lee v. University of South CarolinaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
- Cook v. State Farm Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
- Fickling v. City of CharlestonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.