Electro-Lab of Aiken, Inc. v. Sharp Construction Co. of Sumter, Inc.
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEARN, C.J.:
Electro-Lab of Aiken asserts that Sharp Construction Company breached the parties’ contract by replacing Electro-Lab with a different subcontractor. The parties became contractually bound, Electro-Lab argues, by virtue of Sharp’s use of Electro-Lab’s subcontracting bid in its general contracting bid and by certain acts following the use of the bid. The trial court disagreed, concluding that no contract existed between the parties. We affirm.
FACTS
On April 24, 1997, bidding closed for all general contractors on two projects to build schools in York County, South Car olina. Before…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- Sauner v. Public Service AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
- Regions Bank v. SchmauchCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
- Mitchell v. SiqueirosIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
- Electrical Construction & Maintenance Company, Inc. v. Maeda Pacific CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Rushing v. McKinneyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
- Lee v. University of South CarolinaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
- Stevens & Wilkinson of South Carolina, Inc. v. City of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011
- Consignment Sales, LLC v. Tucker Oil Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010
- Jenkins v. Refuge Temple Church of God in Christ, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2018
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.