Legal Opinion
Cook v. State Farm Automobile Insurance
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided January 17, 2008No. 4337PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
Toni Smith (Mother), as guardian ad litem and natural parent for Trade Smith (Daughter), and Jesse Cook (Grandfather) appeal the Master-in-Equity’s (the Master) order finding Daughter was not entitled to recover underinsured motorist (UIM) benefits under Grandfather’s insurance policies with State Farm Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm). We affirm.
FACTS
On November 8, 2001, Daughter was a passenger in a 1999 Isuzu automobile, which collided with a tree. Daughter, a minor at the time, suffered personal injuries in the collision. Grandfather and Mother filed an action against the driver. *429T…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Felts v. Richland CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
- Torrington Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
- Hofer v. St. ClairSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
- Buddin v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1967
- Hardware Mutual Casualty Co. v. Home Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance v. JM Smith CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
- Atain Specialty Insurance Company v. Carolina Professional Builders LLCDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2020
- Carolina Auto Remarketing Services LLC v. Zurich Insurance Group and Universal Underwriters Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2020
- Cincinnati Insurance Company, The v. Charlotte Paint Company IncDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2020
- Gilbert v. Hightower Construction Co IncDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.