Legal Opinion

Byrnes v. Jamitkowski

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided July 31, 1990No. 90-P-428PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtIreland, J.

The sole issue before us is the propriety of the allowance by a Superior Court judge of the plaintiffs motion to disqualify the defendants’ counsel pursuant to S.J.C. Rule 3:07, DR 5-101 & 5-102, 382 Mass. 779-780 (1981). 2 See Superior Court Rule 12 (1974). The plaintiff filed a two-count complaint against the defendants. Count I alleged that the plaintiff was wrongfully discharged as an employee of the defendants. Count II alleged that, following the discharge, the parties orally agreed to a severance agreement which the defendants then violated. The defendants’ answer to the complaint…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Borman v. BormanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  2. Maddocks v. RickerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  3. Serody v. SerodyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
  4. Gorovitz v. Planning Board of NantucketMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  5. Wellman v. WillisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Smaland Beach Ass'n v. GenovaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
  2. Steinert v. SteinertMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2008
  3. Byington v. City of BostonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1994
  4. Kveraga-Olson v. SternbergMassachusetts Superior Court · 1997
  5. Clair v. ClairMassachusetts Superior Court · 2011

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API