Legal Opinion

Gorovitz v. Planning Board of Nantucket

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 12, 1985PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAbrams, J.

This case poses the question whether a general partner of a limited partnership, who serves as the partnership’s legal counsel and who is a named plaintiff in an action, may represent the partnership in that action if he intends to testify at trial. We conclude that, under Rule 3:07 of the Rules of the Supreme Judicial Court (1981) and G. L. c. 221, § 48, 2 he may do so.

The case is submitted on a statement of agreed facts. The plaintiffs are general partners of the Nantucket Collaborative, a limited partnership owning a forty-five acre parcel of land in Nantucket. In December, 1981, the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Borman v. BormanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  2. Serody v. SerodyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
  3. Shapira v. BudishMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  4. Gordon v. City of MedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Adoption of EricaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  2. Arthur J. Halleran, Jr., Etc. v. Harry M. Hoffman, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
  3. Wellman v. WillisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  4. Cacciola v. NellhausMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
  5. In Re American Cable Publications, Inc., Debtor. Matthew D. Skeen, Trustee v. Chase Manhattan Bank, and Cable T v. Magazine, Inc., Intervenor-Defendant-Appellee. Oliver E. Frascona, and Third Party v. Paul Gaston, Third Party William J. Wipperfurth, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API