Legal Opinion
Borman v. Borman
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided August 16, 1979PublishedCited by 150 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLiacos, J.
The two substantive issues raised by this appeal and cross appeal arose in the pretrial stage of cross actions for divorce. The appeals come to us 1 in advance of a definitive determination of the rights and liabilities in dispute. The husband, Bernard N. Borman, appeals from the order of the Probate Court judge disqualifying as counsel two of his law partners. He argues, in essence, that the judge misapplied S.J.C. Rule 3:22, DR 5-101, DR 5-102, 359 Mass. 796, 814 (1972), the basis for the disqualification order. We agree.
The wife, Corinne L. Borman, appeals from the judge’s order that she…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Cobbledick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Perlman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by150 opinions
- S & S Hotel Ventures Limited Partnership v. 777 S. H. Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Brum v. Town of DartmouthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
- Fabre v. WaltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
- Kent v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
- O'NEIL v. BerganDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
145 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.