Alamance Lumber Co. v. Edwards

PlAINTIEr’s Appeal.

Seawell, J.

¥e see nothing in the order striking out certain portions of the complaint which may be harmful to the plaintiff or embar rassing to it in the prosecution of its cause, and the order will not be •disturbed. Patterson v. R. R., 214 N. C., 38, 198 S. E., 364; Pemberton v. Greensboro, 203 N. C., 514, 515, 172 S. E., 196.

DEFENDANTS’ APPEAL.

It is apparent that the defendant Edwards intends to take whatever advantage he may of the windfall that has come to him by reason of the innocent mistake of the original adjoining landowner who, unwittingly, •constructed his house…