Williams v. . Thompson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.
On a motion to strike tbe test of relevancy of a pleading is tbe right of tbe pleader to offer in evidence at tbe trial tbe facts relied upon to sustain tbe plea which, if established, will constitute a cause of action or a defense. And so, if tbe ultimate fact pleaded in a reply is not inconsistent with tbe cause of action alleged in the complaint and constitutes a defense, in whole or in part, to a plea for affirmative relief set up in tbe answer, it should not be stricken. Patterson v. R. R., 214 N. C., 38, 198 S. E., 364; Trust Co. v. Dunlop, 214 N. C., 196, 198 S. E., 645; Pemberton v.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pemberton v. City of GreensboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Patterson v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Service Fire Insurance v. Horton Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Trust Co. v. . DunlopSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Hanie v. . PenlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Boudreau v. BaughmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- Brown v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Weant v. McCanlessSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Williams Ex Rel. Williams v. Union County Hospital Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Sorrell v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.