Legal Opinion

Williams v. . Thompson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 26, 1947PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.

On a motion to strike tbe test of relevancy of a pleading is tbe right of tbe pleader to offer in evidence at tbe trial tbe facts relied upon to sustain tbe plea which, if established, will constitute a cause of action or a defense. And so, if tbe ultimate fact pleaded in a reply is not inconsistent with tbe cause of action alleged in the complaint and constitutes a defense, in whole or in part, to a plea for affirmative relief set up in tbe answer, it should not be stricken. Patterson v. R. R., 214 N. C., 38, 198 S. E., 364; Trust Co. v. Dunlop, 214 N. C., 196, 198 S. E., 645; Pemberton v.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pemberton v. City of GreensboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  2. Patterson v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  3. Service Fire Insurance v. Horton Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  4. Trust Co. v. . DunlopSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  5. Hanie v. . PenlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Boudreau v. BaughmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  2. Brown v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. Weant v. McCanlessSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. Williams Ex Rel. Williams v. Union County Hospital Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  5. Sorrell v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API