Legal Opinion

Hitkansut LLC v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided May 2, 2014No. 1:12-cv-00303PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER 1

LETTOW, Judge.

Following claim construction in this patent case, the government has moved for summary judgment, asserting that the claims, as construed, are ineligible for patent protection because they relate to nonstatutory subject matter. Def.’s Mot. for Summary Judgment of Invalidity of U.S. Patent No. 7,175,722 as Claiming Nonstatutory Subject Matter Under 35 U.S.C. § 101 (“Def.’s Mot.”), ECF No. 42. Plaintiffs Hitkansut LLC and Aceele-dyne Technologies, Ltd. LLC (collectively, “Hitkansut”) resist this motion and defend the patentability of their claims for structural…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Bilski v. KapposSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hitkansut LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  2. Hitkansut LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  3. Hitkansut LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  4. Kingman Reef Atoll Investments, L.L.C. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  5. Hitkansut LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API