Legal Opinion
Hitkansut LLC v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided December 12, 2014No. 12-303CPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Patent case; U.S. Patent No. 7,175,722 entitled “Methods and Apparatus for Stress Relief Using Multiple Energy Sources;” enablement challenge; 35 U.S.C. § 112, Paragraph 1 (2006); Wands factors; dependent claim that does not state a further limitation on the independent claim upon which it depends; 35 U.S.C. § 112, Paragraph 4 (2006)
OPINION AND ORDER 1
LETTOW, Judge.
This patent case concerns a thermomagnetic processing method employed in research conducted by the government acting through Oak Ridge National Laboratory (“Oak Ridge” or “the government”) and by private entities through…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hitkansut LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Hitkansut LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017